|
|
Linking Residential Substance Abuse Treatment Professionals to Resources and Information
Prison therapeutic communities within the RSAT grant program have expanded to provide more available beds for substance abusing inmates. In January the Level I (minimum) security Brunswick Work Center in Lawrenceville, changed to a full service TC instead of a Phase IV transitional program as previously planned. It quickly filled approximately 76 of its 100 beds with women from both within the institution and from other womens prisons, due to reductions in security levels of women in these other institutions. The Fluvanna Correctional Center for Women, a level III (maximum) security institution in Troy, VA added a second 56-bed dorm for its TC program. As these institutions and the TCs at Pocahontas Correctional Unit #13, and the Virginia Correctional Center for Women which doubled their beds late last year continue to go through their growing pains, some common issues have had to be addressed. These are:
Programs dealing with family molding, to improve relationships have been tried at VCCW. A marathon was conducted at Fluvanna to make the women look at the TC and how they could make it better. Self-bookings are dealt with in a variety of ways in the jail and prison programs. Some programs dont allow self-bookings. Others discourage it because inmates should not feel that they can do something and then confess and its all right, or they should be able to stop the behavior before it starts. Others recognize that inmates may catch themselves doing something they shouldnt early in the program (phase I) but by the time they are a mature phase II or a phase III, they should be able to control their behavior. These differences in the programs will continue as all strive for excellence and the development of that ideal program model that will make Virginia an example to the Nation.
The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administrations (SAMSA) Center for Abuse Treatment has issued a guide to help communities design treatment programs for substance abusing juvenile offenders. The guide is called "Strategies for Integrating Substance Abuse Treatment and the Juvenile Justice System: A Practical Guide". The guide emphasis that programs should be holistic, effective, culturally relevant and gender-specific treatment. Programs need to involve juvenile justice, substance abuse treatment, faith communities, schools, community-based organizations and other providers of health and social services. SAMSA Administrator Nelba Chavez, Ph.D. noted that "our programs have shown the clear link between substance abuse and juvenile delinquency. We have to start thinking of crime related to substance abuse as a public health crisis that requires public health solutions. That means that while we work to build a comprehensive approach to assist juvenile offenders, we must also invest resources in reaching children and adolescents before they first use drugs, enter the criminal justice system, or before problems compound." The guide outlines factors necessary for the development of effective programs for juveniles. These include:
Another publication issued in July, 1999 focuses on treatment programs for women who are incarcerated and have a substance abuse treatment need. The guide, "Substance Abuse Treatment for Women Offenders" is Number 23 in the Center for Substance Abuse Treatments (CSAT) Technical Assistance Publication Services (TAPS). This guide emphasizes the need for a continuity of care, from the pre-sentencing period through in-custody treatment and continuing treatment in the months following release. This allows a woman to develop the skills needed to live without drugs. The publication emphasizes the need for the development of gender-specific treatment programs. Programs designed for men cannot just be transferred to women. The New Jersey Department of Corrections compiled a profile of a typical substance abusing woman offender in that states correctional system. The woman is 30 years old, spends $1,000 per week to support her addiction and has been addicted for nine years. She is most likely to be a daily user of cocaine or heroin, and also uses alcohol and illicit drugs. She is typically a single head of household with minor, dependent children and has experienced emotional, physical or sexual abuse. Eighty-five percent of the women in the New Jersey Department of Corrections institutions are incarcerated for offenses related to drug use. Dr. Nelba Chavez, Ph.D., SAMHSAs Administrator has indicated that "women-centered approaches to alcohol and drug addiction treatment can empower women and give them some control over their lives. They often focus on bonding with women for support and developing skills in parenting, controlling anger and stress, identifying warning signs of relapse and managing budgets." Both publications may be ordered from SAMHSAs National Clearing house for Alcohol and Drug Information (NCADI) at 1-800-729-6686.
Therapeutic communities have spread in prisons within the United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Therapeutic Communities for Offenders [Cullen, E. (1997) edited by Cullen, Jones and Woodward. Chichester: Wiley] edited by three British prison psychologists each working in a different prison TC demonstrates that therapeutic communities are being taken seriously by the prison authorities, who see in them at the very least a way of containing violent and disruptive prisoners and as a way of rehabilitating offenders who have some motivation to change. In the United States the TC model of choice for dealing with prison populations is the hierarchical model developed by Daytop and Phoenix House and other drug rehabilitation centers. In the United Kingdom the democratic/psychodynamic model (for understanding ones response to situations), developed by Maxwell Jones and others has been used. For both models a higher level of success has been found when the prison based TC experience is followed up with further treatment and employment in the community. The authors highlight an interesting discrepancy between inadequate staff training and supervision leading to poor quality programs, and the apparent success in research terms and the governments willingness to increase the TCs available to prison inmates. Their interpretation of this is that the models used are sufficiently robust to be effective even under less than optimal conditions.
Tom Wilkinsons observations of the RSAT prison and jail TCs operating in Virginia shows greater training resources for treatment and security personnel in prisons than in jails. This does effect program quality, however, in both the prison and jail TCs the staffs appear to be dedicated, hard working and have the best interests of their inmate clients in the forefront. The level of programming is enhanced by this commitment. Hats off to Virginias dedicated treatment staffs! Tom Wilkinson, in his visits to Virginias TCs, saw a family atmosphere where personal disclosure and group cohesion is a total contrast to the normal prison or jail life for the general population. A major need in maintaining the effectiveness of the TCs may be to ensure that the boundaries between the treatment program inmates and the general population remain strong.
In an interview for the Therapeutic Communities of America News (1999), Dr. Clark made the following observations:
Publications Available on Substance Abuse and Mental Disorders National Gains Center Publications For information on any of these brochures contact 1-800-311-GAIN.
8. Intervention Strategies for Offenders with Co-Occurring Disorders: What Works? Identification of offenders at high risk and the appropriate screening and assessment for this population. Main Page----Criminal Justice Services----Services & Programs----Publications |
Send an e-mail to
|